FIRSTAR CORP
CIK 37076Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Brown & Wood | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| Quarles & Brady | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Gary R. BronsteinKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MITCHELL KLEINMANBrown & WoodFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.49 | 1.05 | 0.62 |
| Gary R. BronsteinKilpatrick Townsend | Sep 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MITCHELL KLEINMANBrown & Wood | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.50 |