REGIONS FINANCIAL CORP RF (last ticker on record)
CIK 36032Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Bracewell LLP | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Alston & Bird | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frank M. Conner IIICovington & BurlingFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven S. DunlevieWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- National Commerce BancorporationFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Tucker Anthony SutroFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank M. Conner IIICovington & Burling | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven S. DunlevieWomble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| National Commerce Bancorporation | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Tucker Anthony Sutro | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 25 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.91 |