NEXT GENERATION MANAGEMENT CORP. NGMC (last ticker on record)
CIK 356292Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2004 to Feb 2016
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen M. FlemingFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- DAVIS GILLETT MOTTERN & SIMS, LLCFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- I NVESTMENT LAW GROUPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 2.09× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- INVESTMENT LAW GROUP OF GILLETT, MOTTERN & WALKER, LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.17× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Hazel & Thomas, P.C.First linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen M. Fleming | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 64 | 1.42 | 1.22 | 1.25 |
| DAVIS GILLETT MOTTERN & SIMS, LLC | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| I NVESTMENT LAW GROUP | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.37 | 2.09 | 1.50 |
| INVESTMENT LAW GROUP OF GILLETT, MOTTERN & WALKER, LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 0.80 |
| Hazel & Thomas, P.C. | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. FlemingFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Robert J. MotternDAVIS GILLETT MOTTERN & SIMS, LLCFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 2.36× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- James DeOldenFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.98× · Went dark 2.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 3.30× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen M. FlemingStephen M. Fleming | Feb 2014 | Named in a filing | 84 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.06 |
| Robert J. MotternDAVIS GILLETT MOTTERN & SIMS, LLC | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.84 | 2.36 | 0.53 |
| James DeOlden | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.98 | 2.07 | 1.17 |
| Kathleen L. CervenyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.51 | 3.30 | 2.28 |