Gold Merger Sub, LLC PNK (last ticker on record)

CIK 356213Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Mar 2012
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 18; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 6; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Apr 28, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 4, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 15, 2013Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 5, 2013Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 19, 2012Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 27, 2011Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 14, 2011Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
May 12, 2010Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 19, 2010Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 1, 2009Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 14, 2005Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Feb 2016	Named in a filing	889	1.31	0.07	0.59
Morrison & Foerster	Sep 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	825	1.17	0.55	1.15
Faegre Baker Daniels	Mar 2012	Named in a filing	145	1.06	0.34	1.16
Jones Walker	Mar 2012	Named in a filing	161	1.34	0.23	0.94
Taft Stettinius & Hollister	Mar 2012	Named in a filing	94	1.64	0.31	0.69
Baker & Daniels	May 2010	Named in a filing	129	1.11	0.45	1.22
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP	May 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	223	0.67	0.75	0.97
Sills Cummis & Gross	May 2010	Named in a filing	44	1.02	0.82	0.93
LATHROP & GAGE LLP	Jun 2004	Named in a filing	50	0.32	0.88	0.52
Adams and Reese	Sep 2003	Named in a filing	37	1.78	0.43	1.55
Watkins Ludlam Winter & Stennis	Sep 2003	Named in a filing	32	0.70	0.00	0.31
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	May 2000	Named in a filing	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Irell & Manella	Sep 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	76	1.73	1.09	1.23
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Sep 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42
Baker Botts L.L.P.	Apr 2014	Text search only	495	1.32	0.09	1.03
Shearman & Sterling	Mar 2008	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Armstrong Teasdale	Jun 2004	Text search only	64	1.00	0.00	1.51
Stinson Morrison Hecker	Jun 2004	Text search only	93	1.26	0.00	0.96

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	95% wipeout
Neil P. StronskiSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Apr 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	14	1.28	0.58
Stephen F. ArcanoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jul 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	35	1.14	0.52
David M. LynnMorrison & Foerster	Sep 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	26	2.16	0.48
Nick P. SaggeseSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	May 2000	Named in a filing	11	0.00	0.94
Alvin G. SegelIrell & Manella	Sep 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	11	1.28	0.79
Ashok W. MukheyIrell & Manella	Sep 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	12	1.41	0.83