CA, INC. CA (last ticker on record)
CIK 356028Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- HOWARD, SMITH & LEVIN LLPFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- HOWARD, DARBY & LEVINFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Gunster Yoakley & StewartFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Covington & Burling | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| HOWARD, SMITH & LEVIN LLP | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| HOWARD, DARBY & LEVIN | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Gunster Yoakley & Stewart | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 45 | 1.42 | 0.39 | 0.36 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd W. EcklandPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- David B. HarmsSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert W. DownesSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- James C. MorphySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Keith A. PagnaniSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Bruce C. BennettCovington & BurlingFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Stephen A. InfanteCovington & BurlingFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Scott F. SmithCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Herbert J. HuffFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- David J. BergerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd W. EcklandPillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| David B. HarmsSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert W. DownesSullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.62 | 0.82 | 0.52 |
| James C. MorphySullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Keith A. PagnaniSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Bruce C. BennettCovington & Burling | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Stephen A. InfanteCovington & Burling | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Scott F. SmithCovington & Burling | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Herbert J. Huff | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| David J. BergerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 6 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 36 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.50 |