LOJACK CORP LOJN (last ticker on record)
CIK 355777Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter W. WardleGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Jacqueline MercierGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Lisa R. HaddadGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter W. WardleGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Jacqueline MercierGoodwin Procter | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Feb 2016 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Lisa R. HaddadGoodwin Procter | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.28 |