ESSEX CORP KEYW (last ticker on record)
CIK 355199Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Whiteford Taylor & PrestonFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan & Hartson | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Whiteford Taylor & Preston | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.16 | 0.48 | 1.28 |
| HALE AND DORR | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence T. YanowitchMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- John R. HempillMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 2.63× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin GumpFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Paul A. BelvinAkin GumpFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
- D. Scott FreedWhiteford Taylor & PrestonFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence T. YanowitchMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| John R. HempillMorrison & Foerster | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.53 | 2.63 | 1.03 |
| Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin Gump | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Paul A. BelvinAkin Gump | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 8 | 1.19 | 1.80 | 2.79 |
| D. Scott FreedWhiteford Taylor & Preston | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.06 |