Glen Rose Petroleum CORP GLRP (last ticker on record)
CIK 354567Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- POLLET, RICHARDSON & PATELFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| POLLET, RICHARDSON & PATEL | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.78 | 2.39 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dorothy B. VinskiRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorothy B. VinskiRichardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 1.48 |
| Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.80 | 1.73 | 2.22 |
| Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |