ALICO, INC. ALCO (last ticker on record)
CIK 3545Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Fowler WhiteFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.97× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 70 | 0.49 | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Nelson Mullins | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Fowler White | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 2.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Darrell C. SmithShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Matthew M. GuestWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Daniel B. Nunn Jr.McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- DAVID C. SHOBEFowler WhiteFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.23× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrell C. SmithShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Matthew M. GuestWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Daniel B. Nunn Jr.McGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DAVID C. SHOBEFowler White | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 4.23 | 1.17 |