ICO INC ICOC (last ticker on record)
CIK 353567Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Locke LordFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Dilworth Paxson LLPFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Locke Lord | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Dilworth Paxson LLP | Feb 1996 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.96 | 1.58 | 1.04 |
| KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.68×
- Kevin P. LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.71×
- T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.68 |
| Kevin P. LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.64 | 0.20 | 1.96 |
| Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.67 |