ENGELHARD CORP EC (last ticker on record)
CIK 352947Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- RICHARD D. KATCHERWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kenneth W. OrceCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Leslie DuffyCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- John SchusterCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Peter D. LyonsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICHARD D. KATCHERWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kenneth W. OrceCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Leslie DuffyCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| John SchusterCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Peter D. LyonsShearman & Sterling | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 25 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.32 |