UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC UHS (last ticker on record)
CIK 352915Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Aug 2015 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C.First linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Waller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Aug 2015 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C. | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 25 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 76 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 1.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunter RostWaller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher L. HowardWaller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter RostWaller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher L. HowardWaller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 5 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 |