ZARLINK SEMICONDUCTOR INC ZARLF (last ticker on record)
CIK 352435Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2000 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- SNR Denton US LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Rubin Baum Levin Constant & FriedmanFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| SNR Denton US LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.92 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Rubin Baum Levin Constant & Friedman | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.45 | 1.91 | 1.31 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loren J. WeberO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Warren T. LazarowO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Denise M. TormeySNR Denton US LLPFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loren J. WeberO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Warren T. LazarowO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.24 | 0.64 | 1.02 |
| Denise M. TormeySNR Denton US LLP | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.61 |