ASM INTERNATIONAL N V
CIK 351483Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Streich LangFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarles & Brady | Mar 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Herbert Smith | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Mayer Brown | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Streich Lang | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 2.02 | 1.15 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven P. EmerickQuarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- P. Robert MoyaQuarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John BanesDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven P. EmerickQuarles & Brady | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| P. Robert MoyaQuarles & Brady | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.40 | 1.90 | 0.00 |
| John BanesDavis Polk | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 8 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.51 |