INTERGRAPH CORP INGR (last ticker on record)
CIK 351145Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Balch & BinghamFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne P.C.First linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Balch & Bingham | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.59 | 0.55 | 1.12 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
| Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne P.C. | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard CapeloutoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 0.96 |