CACHE INC CACH (last ticker on record)
CIK 350199Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2006 to Jul 2015
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & AxelrodFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Hine LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jul 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Akerman LLP | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James NicollSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Neil GoldFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James NicollSchulte Roth & Zabel | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & Zabel | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Neil GoldFulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.50 | 2.51 | 1.71 |