WMS INDUSTRIES INC WMS (last ticker on record)
CIK 350077Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & GoodmanFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- SHACK & SIEGEL, P.C.First linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & Goodman | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| SHACK & SIEGEL, P.C. | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Ballard Spahr | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pamela E. FlahertyFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pamela E. Flaherty | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |