INTER TEL (DELAWARE), INC INTL (last ticker on record)
CIK 350066Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bingham McCutchen | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Patrick J. SchultheisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Brian J. McCarthySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Patrick J. SchultheisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.02 | 0.72 | 1.39 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |
| Brian J. McCarthySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 30 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.81 |