TENAX THERAPEUTICS, INC. TENX (last ticker on record)
CIK 34956Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2018 to Nov 2022
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Smith AndersonFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Parsons Behle & LatimerFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Lehman Walstrand & AssociatesFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- LeClairRyan A Professional CorporationFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cletha A. WalstrandFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pryor Cashman | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
| K&L Gates | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Smith Anderson | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Parsons Behle & Latimer | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.40 | 1.37 | 1.31 |
| Lehman Walstrand & Associates | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.00 | 2.23 | 1.88 |
| LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 93 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 1.10 |
| Cletha A. Walstrand | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 36 | 0.93 | 0.59 | 1.60 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- M. Ali PanjwaniPryor CashmanFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Donald R. ReynoldsWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Margaret N. RosenfeldSmith AndersonFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Mark E. LehmanParsons Behle & LatimerFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 1.97× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Mark N. SchneiderMark N. Schneider A Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Joseph SmithLKP Global Law, LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 3.01× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Ali PanjwaniPryor Cashman | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 80 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 1.25 |
| Donald R. ReynoldsWyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 41 | 0.87 | 0.38 | 0.98 |
| Margaret N. RosenfeldSmith Anderson | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Mark E. LehmanParsons Behle & Latimer | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.17 | 1.97 | 0.90 |
| Mark N. SchneiderMark N. Schneider A Professional Corporation | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.54 | 1.04 | 1.83 |
| Joseph SmithLKP Global Law, LLP | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 12 | 0.82 | 3.01 | 2.30 |