FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC FDO (last ticker on record)
CIK 34408Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Parker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Williams MullenFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Hunton & Williams | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein | May 2016 | Text search only | 45 | 1.03 | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2016 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Williams Mullen | May 2016 | Text search only | 113 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul M. TigerFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Andrew A. GerberHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Phillip B. KennedyGaeta & Eveson, P.A.First linked May 2016 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul M. TigerFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 2.13 | 0.84 | 1.33 |
| Nicolas GrabarCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Andrew A. GerberHunton & Williams | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Phillip B. KennedyGaeta & Eveson, P.A. | May 2016 | Text search only | 5 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |