IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC IKN (last ticker on record)
CIK 3370Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Blank Rome | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Ballard Spahr | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard HallCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Robert RosenmanCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Robert RosenmanCravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 13 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.87 |