ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORP ETCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 33113Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.79 |
| Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 37 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 1.34 |
| Stevens & Lee | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas L. HanleyStradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- William W. Matthews IIIKlehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas L. HanleyStradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.98 | 1.65 | 0.49 |
| William W. Matthews IIIKlehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.91 |