EMERSON ELECTRIC CO EMR (last ticker on record)
CIK 32604Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Husch & EppenbergerFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Husch & Eppenberger | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| Bryan Cave | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William L. ColeBryan CaveFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- J. Mark KlamerBryan CaveFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- MARY ANNE O'CONNELLHusch & EppenbergerFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher MayerHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William L. ColeBryan Cave | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.28 |
| J. Mark KlamerBryan Cave | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| MARY ANNE O'CONNELLHusch & Eppenberger | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher MayerHughes Hubbard & Reed | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |