EMS TECHNOLOGIES INC ELMG (last ticker on record)
CIK 32198Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- KILPATRICK & CODYFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| KILPATRICK & CODY | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- C. William BaxleyKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Daniel T. FalstadTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- William Scott OrtweinAlston & BirdFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Scott OrtweinAlston & BirdFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. William BaxleyKing & Spalding | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Daniel T. FalstadTroutman Sanders LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| William Scott OrtweinAlston & Bird | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Scott OrtweinAlston & Bird | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 17 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.64 |