MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC MXWL (last ticker on record)
CIK 319815Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Riordan & McKinzieFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Foley & Lardner | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Riordan & McKinzie | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.74 | 1.13 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Patrick J. O MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
- Larry W. NishnickDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- JEFFREY P. HIGGINSGunderson DettmerFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Deepak NandaFoley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.67× · Went dark 3.41× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Kenneth D. PolinFoley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Roger H. LustbergRiordan & McKinzieFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick J. O'MalleyDLA Piper | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Patrick J. O MalleyDLA Piper | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 4.16 |
| Larry W. NishnickDLA Piper | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 4.03 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| JEFFREY P. HIGGINSGunderson Dettmer | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Deepak NandaFoley & Lardner | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.67 | 3.41 | 1.40 |
| Kenneth D. PolinFoley & Lardner | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Roger H. LustbergRiordan & McKinzie | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.30 |