MISSION RESOURCES CORP MSSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 319459Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- BUTLER & BINION, L.L.P.First linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.79× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson & Knight | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Porter & Hedges | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Akin Gump | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Haynes and Boone | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| BUTLER & BINION, L.L.P. | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 4.79 | 1.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert G. ReedyPorter & HedgesFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- George G. Young IIIHaynes and BooneFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert G. ReedyPorter & Hedges | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| George G. Young IIIHaynes and Boone | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.40 |