IRIS INTERNATIONAL INC IRIS (last ticker on record)
CIK 319240Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Guth | ChristopherFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 2.69×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 45 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Guth | Christopher | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.09 | 4.29 | 2.69 |
| Irell & Manella | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- David B. FeirsteinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Joseph E. NidaSheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Theodore E. GuthManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.53× · Went dark 5.31× · 95% wipeout 4.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| David B. FeirsteinKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| Joseph E. NidaSheppard Mullin | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Theodore E. GuthManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.53 | 5.31 | 4.21 |