PUBLIC STORAGE INC /CA PSA (last ticker on record)
CIK 318380Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.79 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 155 | 1.15 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Stephanie G. HeimHogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Stephanie G. HeimHogan & Hartson | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |