SWISS MEDICA INC SWME (last ticker on record)
CIK 318245Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sonfield & SonfieldFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.62× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Sonfield & Sonfield | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.16 | 2.62 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jacqueline G. HodesK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 2.43× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Robert L. Sonfield Jr.Sonfield & SonfieldFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 2.65× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Steven L. SiskindFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Jacqueline G. HodesK&L Gates | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.18 | 2.43 | 1.19 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.48 |
| Robert L. Sonfield Jr.Sonfield & Sonfield | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.15 | 2.65 | 0.92 |
| Steven L. Siskind | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.32 | 1.84 | 0.67 |