AMGEN INC AMGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 318154Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 18
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Cooley LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Frank J. AquilaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- BRIAN G. CARTWRIGHTLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Andrea VachssCooley LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Gary OlsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Eric M. KrautheimerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert H. MillerCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Charles I. CogutSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Charles M. NathanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Paul D. TosettiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Frank J. AquilaSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2012 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.57 | 1.12 | 0.64 |
| Gregory P. RodgersLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2005 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| BRIAN G. CARTWRIGHTLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Andrea VachssCooley LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Gary OlsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Eric M. KrautheimerSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 15 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert H. MillerCooley LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Charles I. CogutSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 15 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Charles M. NathanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 11 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Paul D. TosettiLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 16 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.06 |