Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. BTGI (last ticker on record)
CIK 317889Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Jones & Keller, P.C.First linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruppel & Burns | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.63 |
| Jones & Keller, P.C. | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.16 | 1.57 | 1.00 |
| Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 16 | 0.68 | 1.92 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Michael L. CorriganLaw Offices of Michael L. CorriganFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.78× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Brian F. FaulknerFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 2.42× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.23 | 1.59 | 0.97 |
| Michael L. CorriganLaw Offices of Michael L. Corrigan | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.78 | 1.11 | 1.04 |
| Brian F. Faulkner | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.63 | 2.42 | 0.42 |