JACOR COMMUNICATIONS CO

CIK 317833Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

None

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kirkland & Ellis	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Snell & Wilmer	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	244	1.34	1.19	1.38
Perkins Coie	Mar 2009	Named in a filing	511	0.93	0.27	0.98
GRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY	Nov 1997	Named in a filing	13	1.65	1.38	2.34
CHRISTENSEN MILLER FINK JACOBS GLASER WEIL & SHAPIRO	Apr 1997	Named in a filing	21	0.29	0.00	1.05
KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP	Apr 1994	Named in SEC correspondence	16	0.84	0.00	0.56
Shearman & Sterling	Jun 2013	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Baker & McKenzie	Mar 2009	Text search only	587	1.07	0.72	1.00
Greenberg Traurig	Mar 2009	Text search only	1,223	1.01	1.03	1.10
Latham & Watkins LLP	Mar 2009	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Lionel Sawyer & Collins	Mar 2009	Text search only	128	1.07	0.88	0.96
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP	Mar 2009	Text search only	390	1.38	0.86	1.22
Ropes & Gray	Mar 2009	Text search only	914	0.98	0.14	0.92
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Mar 2009	Text search only	783	1.09	0.11	1.03

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Brian D. WolfeKirkland & Ellis	Nov 2013	Named in a filing	6	0.00	0.00	2.17
James S. RoweKirkland & Ellis	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	37	1.54	0.00	2.06
Richard G. SchmalzlGRAYDON, HEAD & RITCHEY	Nov 1997	Named in a filing	10	1.29	3.45	2.64
Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP	Jan 1995	Named in SEC correspondence	14	0.50	0.00	0.67
Paul V. MuethingKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP	Apr 1994	Named in SEC correspondence	8	0.81	0.00	0.00
Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2011	Text search only	33	1.53	0.00	1.11
Alfred O. RoseRopes & Gray	Mar 2009	Text search only	27	1.30	0.00	2.24
Brian C. ErbRopes & Gray	Mar 2009	Text search only	27	0.31	0.80	0.36
David C. ChapinRopes & Gray	Mar 2009	Text search only	30	0.61	0.00	0.72
P. GREGORY HIDALGOVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Mar 2009	Text search only	13	1.68	0.00	0.63
William J. McDonough Jr.	Mar 2009	Text search only	9	0.00	0.00	0.00