COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGY CORP CPTC (last ticker on record)
CIK 317477Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Dorothy B. VinskiRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann SaponeRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.36 | 2.18 | 1.61 |
| Dorothy B. VinskiRichardson & Patel LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 1.48 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.48 |