ANDREW CORP ANDW (last ticker on record)
CIK 317093Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jones DayFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Foley & Lardner | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Arnold & Porter | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Schiff Hardin | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Jones Day | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lois HerzecaFried Frank | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.74 |