TERAFORCE TECHNOLOGY CORP TERA (last ticker on record)
CIK 316672Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| HALE AND DORR | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILLIAM L. BOEINGHaynes and BooneFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILLIAM L. BOEINGHaynes and Boone | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.32 | 1.02 | 0.00 |
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.31 |