CONOCO CANADA RESOURCES LTD GOU_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 316456Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Arent FoxFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Arent Fox | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Bennett Jones | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Macleod Dixon | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George G. Young IIIHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Richard HallCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George G. Young IIIHaynes and Boone | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 14 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Richard HallCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2002 | Text search only | 47 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.55 |