EXCO RESOURCES INC XCOOQ (last ticker on record)

CIK 316300Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Bankruptcy
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 4; Newest began Jan 2018
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 15; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 6; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jan 17, 2018Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 17, 2018Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 27, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 15, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 16, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 20, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 31, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 1, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 3, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 1, 2012A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Feb 27, 2012A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 15, 2010Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 5, 2006Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 23, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Nov 18, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kirkland & Ellis	Aug 2017	Named in a filing	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Akin Gump	May 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	582	1.24	0.52	1.25
Haynes and Boone	Apr 1998	Named in SEC correspondence	353	1.03	0.56	0.84
Latham & Watkins LLP	Aug 2017	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Fulbright & Jaworski	Jan 2007	Text search only	359	1.10	0.75	1.35
Baker Botts L.L.P.	Nov 2005	Text search only	495	1.32	0.09	1.03
Blake Cassels & Graydon	Apr 2004	Text search only	227	0.73	0.49	0.80
Bennett Jones	Mar 2004	Text search only	121	1.27	0.16	1.29
Cravath Swaine & Moore	Mar 2004	Text search only	839	1.29	0.03	0.85
Fraser Milner Casgrain	Mar 2004	Text search only	66	0.98	0.18	0.72
Shearman & Sterling	Mar 2004	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Fried Frank	Dec 2003	Text search only	540	1.33	0.24	0.94
Sullivan & Cromwell	Jun 2003	Text search only	1,047	1.40	0.15	0.69
Thompson & Knight	Mar 2003	Text search only	198	1.03	0.40	1.38
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP	May 2001	Text search only	117	1.13	0.97	1.24

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Jennifer T. WisinskiHaynes and Boone	Dec 2013	Named in a filing	11	0.99	4.65	0.00
W. Scott WallaceHaynes and Boone	Jun 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	9	1.08	1.45	0.80
Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & Zabel	Mar 2003	Named in a filing	24	1.00	0.00	0.36
P. GREGORY HIDALGOVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jan 2007	Text search only	13	1.68	0.00	0.63
OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Jan 2006	Text search only	160	1.27	0.15	0.90
William J. Whelan IIICravath Swaine & Moore	Mar 2004	Text search only	51	0.79	0.00	0.52