EDO CORP EDO (last ticker on record)
CIK 31617Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2007 to Aug 2007
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dechert LLPFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Esanu Katsky Korins & SigerFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 3.90× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Katsky KorinsFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dechert LLP | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Esanu Katsky Korins & Siger | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 1.30 | 3.90 | 1.33 |
| Katsky Korins | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 1.37 | 0.98 | 2.28 |
| Brown & Wood | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher G. KarrasDechert LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 2.67× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Sarah B. GelbDechert LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Robert F. Quaintance Jr.Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher G. KarrasDechert LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.65 | 2.67 | 1.51 |
| Sarah B. GelbDechert LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Robert F. Quaintance Jr.Debevoise & Plimpton | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.00 |