UQM TECHNOLOGIES INC UQM (last ticker on record)
CIK 315449Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Nick NimmoHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 2.14×
- Ronald J. FrappierJenkens & GilchristFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.12 | 1.51 | 1.36 |
| Nick NimmoHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.97 | 1.39 | 2.14 |
| Ronald J. FrappierJenkens & Gilchrist | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 22 | 0.65 | 1.79 | 1.25 |