LA QUINTA PROPERTIES INC LQI (last ticker on record)
CIK 314661Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Akin Gump | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Choate Hall & Stewart | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frederick B. McLaneO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Terry M. SchpokAkin GumpFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frederick B. McLaneO Melveny & Myers LLP | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Terry M. SchpokAkin Gump | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 12 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |