BP PLC BP (last ticker on record)
CIK 313807Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jamie L. YarbroughBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- John Horsfield-BradburySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kathryn A. CampbellSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie L. YarbroughBaker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| John Horsfield-BradburySullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kathryn A. CampbellSullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert E. BuckholzSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 39 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 0.93 |