HARDINGE INC HDNG (last ticker on record)
CIK 313716Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Phillips LytleFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Phillips Lytle | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- JONATHAN JEWETTShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| JONATHAN JEWETTShearman & Sterling | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 2.10 |