HKN, Inc. HKN (last ticker on record)
CIK 313478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hallett & Perrin, P.C.First linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hallett & Perrin, P.C. | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.70 | 2.06 | 1.25 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Haynes and Boone | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Norton Rose | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bruce H. HallettHallett & Perrin, P.C.First linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- William A. NewmanMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 2.37×
- Amar BudarapuBaker & McKenzieFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.84× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Wallace T. BoyackFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce H. HallettHallett & Perrin, P.C. | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| William A. NewmanMcGuireWoods LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.37 |
| Amar BudarapuBaker & McKenzie | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 1.29 |
| Wallace T. Boyack | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |