AMSOUTH BANCORPORATION ASO (last ticker on record)
CIK 3133Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Hill Ward & HendersonFirst linked Oct 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Muldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLPFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Maynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Hill Ward & Henderson | Oct 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Holland & Knight | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Muldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLP | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Maynard Cooper & Gale | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mitchell S. EitelSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- MICHAEL L. JAMIESONHolland & KnightFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 3.55× · 95% wipeout 2.59×
- Cynthia M. KrusEversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Michael SavageMaynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell S. EitelSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| MICHAEL L. JAMIESONHolland & Knight | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.45 | 3.55 | 2.59 |
| Cynthia M. KrusEversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Michael SavageMaynard Cooper & Gale | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |