EATON CORP ETN (last ticker on record)
CIK 31277Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Benesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linklaters LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| A&L Goodbody | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Arthur Cox | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 55 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Lisa L. JacobsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- JONATHAN JEWETTShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Lisa L. JacobsShearman & Sterling | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| JONATHAN JEWETTShearman & Sterling | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 2.10 |