EASTERN CO EML (last ticker on record)
CIK 31107Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Reid and RiegeFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 10.48× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day Pitney LLP | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Reid and Riege | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.47 | 10.48 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott W. GoodmanDay Pitney LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Peter G. SmithKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott W. GoodmanDay Pitney LLP | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Matthew J. GilroyWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Peter G. SmithKramer Levin Naftalis | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.25 |