COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES INC CTCO (last ticker on record)
CIK 310433Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTEREDFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- WolfBlock LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 78 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 1.36 |
| WolfBlock LLP | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 84 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert I. Townsend IIICravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Barbara NimsDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Luciana FatoCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julia CowlesDavis PolkFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- William L. TaylorDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- FRANCIS J. MORISONFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Peter R. DouglasFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert I. Townsend IIICravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Barbara NimsDavis Polk | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Luciana FatoCravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Julia CowlesDavis Polk | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| William L. TaylorDavis Polk | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| FRANCIS J. MORISON | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.78 |
| Peter R. Douglas | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |