HBO & CO HBOC (last ticker on record)
CIK 310377Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arnall Golden GregoryFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.First linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Mar 1997 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Jones DayFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnall Golden Gregory | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 60 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
| OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Mar 1997 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Jones Day | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lisa A. StaterJones DayFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.65×
- John E. ZamerJones DayFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa A. StaterJones Day | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 3.65 |
| John E. ZamerJones Day | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 3.41 |