CANARGO ENERGY CORP CNR (last ticker on record)
CIK 310316Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 1998 to Dec 2009
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & KnightFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Satterlee Stephens LLPFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- KELLY LYTTON MINTZ & VANN LLPFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.90× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 5.87×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Knight | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Satterlee Stephens LLP | Aug 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.33 | 0.36 | 1.31 |
| KELLY LYTTON MINTZ & VANN LLP | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.90 | 1.33 | 5.87 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Fasken Martineau | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Helen W. MelmanFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 2.00× · 95% wipeout 3.43×
- David GonzalezFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen W. Melman | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.99 | 2.00 | 3.43 |
| David Gonzalez | May 2004 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |