FLOWSERVE CORP FLS (last ticker on record)
CIK 30625Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Sep 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elizabeth A. IsingGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Krista P. HanveyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Thomas J. RiceBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.10× · Went dark 2.73× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Christopher C. PaciDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- ROBERT A. KINDLERCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth A. IsingGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Krista P. HanveyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Thomas J. RiceBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.10 | 2.73 | 1.94 |
| Stephen L. BurnsCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Christopher C. PaciDLA Piper | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| ROBERT A. KINDLERCravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |